Show that f is continuous but not differentiable at (0, 0)
1
Expert's answer
2022-01-24T02:42:20-0500
By definition, f(0,0)=0.Now consider the limits along straight lines x=t, y=at(or y=ax, where a is the Slope) ast→0+.Then,limt→0+f(t,at)=limt→0+t2+(at)2(at)3)=limt→0+t2+a2t2a3t3=limt→0+1+a2a3t=0Next, If the two-variable limit exists, then it must be equal to 0.This can be verified by the means of the simplified squeeze principle; that is, one has to verify that ∃h(R)∋∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣≤h(R)→0 asR=x2+y2→0.Now,∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣=∣x2+y2y3∣≤∣x2+y2∣∣y3∣≤2R2R3=2R→0,as R→0 where the inequalities∣x∣≤R and ∣y∣≤R have been used . Thus, the two-variable limit exists at (0,0) and equals 0=f(0,0).We can therefore conclude that the given function is continuous.Differentiating with respect to x yields: fx(x,y)=(x2+y2)2−2xy3Now, fx(0,0)=0,butNow consider the limits along straight lines x=t, y=at(or y=ax, where a is the Slope) ast→0+.Then,lim(x,y)→(0,0)fx(x,y)=lim(x,y)→(0,0)(x2+y2)2−2xy3=limt→0+(t2+(at)2)2−2t(at)3=limt→0+(1+a2)2−2a=(1+a2)2−2a.Since the limit along a straight line depends on the slope of the line. Therefore, the two-variable limit does not exist at (0, 0). Since the limit does not exist, this shows that the partial derivative of the function with respect to x exist but is not continuous.This shows that the function is not differentiable.
Comments