Show that f is continuous but not differentiable at (0, 0)
1
Expert's answer
2022-01-24T02:42:20-0500
By definition, f(0,0)=0.Now consider the limits along straight lines x=t, y=at(or y=ax, where a is the Slope) ast→0+.Then,limt→0+f(t,at)=limt→0+t2+(at)2(at)3)=limt→0+t2+a2t2a3t3=limt→0+1+a2a3t=0Next, If the two-variable limit exists, then it must be equal to 0.This can be verified by the means of the simplified squeeze principle; that is, one has to verify that ∃h(R)∋∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣≤h(R)→0 asR=x2+y2→0.Now,∣f(x,y)−f(0,0)∣=∣x2+y2y3∣≤∣x2+y2∣∣y3∣≤2R2R3=2R→0,as R→0 where the inequalities∣x∣≤R and ∣y∣≤R have been used . Thus, the two-variable limit exists at (0,0) and equals 0=f(0,0).We can therefore conclude that the given function is continuous.Differentiating with respect to x yields: fx(x,y)=(x2+y2)2−2xy3Now, fx(0,0)=0,butNow consider the limits along straight lines x=t, y=at(or y=ax, where a is the Slope) ast→0+.Then,lim(x,y)→(0,0)fx(x,y)=lim(x,y)→(0,0)(x2+y2)2−2xy3=limt→0+(t2+(at)2)2−2t(at)3=limt→0+(1+a2)2−2a=(1+a2)2−2a.Since the limit along a straight line depends on the slope of the line. Therefore, the two-variable limit does not exist at (0, 0). Since the limit does not exist, this shows that the partial derivative of the function with respect to x exist but is not continuous.This shows that the function is not differentiable.
"assignmentexpert.com" is professional group of people in Math subjects! They did assignments in very high level of mathematical modelling in the best quality. Thanks a lot
Comments