Answer to Question #238096 in Psychology for Touzet PHILIPPE

Question

1. Do you think that there may be senses which do not necessarily receive information only from the environment, but rather from within us as well? (For example, how do you sense that you are hungry? If you hold your breath, which sense ‘senses’ that you need air? How do you sense the need for belonging?)
   
2. If you think that we may have more senses than the 5 noted above, would you provide your opinion on why you think the dominant scientific community may not have considered more than the typical 5 senses? If you wish, you may use other references to strengthen or support your discussion.
   
3. How does a “definition” (for example, how we define the 5 senses) help or hinder us in knowing the parameters of a concept, think about a concept’s potential for expansion, or keep a concept within known boundaries?

• Do you think that the definition of sensation needs to be expanded? Why?

Answer 1

Question 1

Yes, I believe that the senses require an internal effect to detect differences in taste. My understanding of coldness varies from person to person, and my emotions of hunger are also affected by the intensity of my inner response to this sensation. There are different senses, according to living science, and one of them is called proprioception. This sense deals with the brain and how it understands our body's requirements, but "proprioception encompasses the feeling of movement and position of our limbs and muscles." We can use our hands or fingertips to touch the tip of our nose with this sense. With our eyes closed, we can accomplish this. The National Institutes of Health performed a study (NM). In this study, people with poor proprioception, mainly through mechanosensation, were discovered to have poor proprioception.

Question 2

Indeed, researchers have been fascinated by knowledge about the senses since Aristotle. It touches on fundamental philosophical issues such as the nature of reality and the perennial question of how we know and if we know it. Over the last 100 years or more, studying human and animal senses has resulted in a massive volume and variety of data. I believe we should stick with the five primary reasons, but expanding it would not be very clear to all of us. However, learning all of our senses could help us with life in the future as we know it. We could have more than just over 14-20 senses when we are older, and we could have more when older. These senses we have today are for life, though it would be cool to read other people's minds.

Question 3

Senses and perception are grouped and hindered under the five primary reasons. On the other hand, sensory systems and mechanisms for sensing interactions are increasingly complex and broad. Prior learning, cultural barriers, societal expectations, and familial ties are all examples of constraints in life.