A manufacturer of fluorescent tubes claims that average life rime is more than 1750 hour, A sample of 400 fluorescent light bulbs produced mean life tone 1600 hours with a standard deviation of ISO hours. Does the claim of the company justified at 5% level of significance?
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0:\\mu\\leq 1570"
"H_1:\\mu>1570"
This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a t-test for one mean, with unknown population standard deviation, using the sample standard deviation, will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha=0.05, df=n-1"
"=400-1=399" degrees of freedom, and the critical value for a right-tailed test is "t_c=1.648682."
The rejection region for this right-tailed test is "R=\\{t:T>1.648682\\}."
The t-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that "t=4>1.648682=t_c," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value for right-tailed "\\alpha=0.05, df=399, t=4" is
"p=0.000038," and since "p=0.000038<0.05=\\alpha," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu" is greater than "1570," at the "\\alpha=0.05" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment