The daily duration of telephone calls received by the enquiry department of a small industry for a randomly selected 11 days over a quarter is as follows:
160, 172, 121, 144, 100, 108, 175, 200, 105, 95, 102
The manager of industry says that the population variance of the daily duration of calls over the quarter is 1500. The authority thinks that it is over estimated. Justify the claims of the manager at 5% level of significance.
"H_0: \\sigma^2 = 1500 \\\\\n\nH_1: \\sigma^2 < 1500 \\\\\n\nN= 11"
Chi-Square Test for the Variance
Test-statistic:
"T = (N-1)(\\frac{s}{\\sigma_0})^2 \\\\\n\n\\bar{x}= \\frac{160+ 172+ ...+ 95+ 102}{11} = 134.72 \\\\\n\ns = \\sqrt{ \\frac{1}{11-1}( (160-134.72)^2+(172-134.72)^2+...+(95-134.72)^2+(102-134.72)^2 ) } = 36.929 \\\\\n\n\\sigma_0 = \\sqrt{1500}=38.729 \\\\\n\nT = (11-1)(\\frac{36.929}{38.729})^2 \\\\\n\nT=9.09 \\\\\n\n\u03b1=0.05"
Lower one-tailed test.
"df=N-1=10 \\\\\n\n\u03c7^2_{\u03b1,10} = 18.307"
Reject H0 if "T< \u03c7^2_{\u03b1,10}"
"T=9.09<\u03c7^2_{\u03b1,10}=18.307"
Reject H0.
There is enough evidence to conclude that that the population variance of the daily duration of calls over the quarter is less than 1500.
Comments
Leave a comment