A manufacturer of electric bulbs claims that his bulbs have a mean life of 25 months with a standard deviation of 5 months. A random sample of 6 such bulbs were taken and their lifespan were recorded.
Life of​ bulbs(in months):23 25 30 20 20 12
Is the​ manufacturer's claim valid at​ 1% level of significance when the table value of t test is​ ±4.032?
​(a) Formulate a null and alternative hypothesis.
​(b) Calculate the​ mean, standard​ deviation, and the tSTAT.
​(c) Interpret the​ manufacturer's claim.
I answered a and b but c made me confused. can anyone help me?
the choices ;
A.
The null hypothesis is rejected as tSTAT is less than the table value. Hence the​ manufacturer's claim is not valid at​ 1% level of significance.
B.
The null hypothesis is not rejected as tSTAT is more than the table value. Hence the​ manufacturer's claim is valid at​ 1% level of significance.
C.
The null hypothesis is not rejected as tSTAT is less than the table value. Hence the​ manufacturer's claim is valid at​ 1% level of significance.
D.
The null hypothesis is rejected as tSTAT is more than the table value. Hence the​ manufacturer's claim is not valid at​ 1% level of significance.
Solution
a).
b). Mean, "\\bar{x}"
"\\bar {x} =21.6667"
Standard deviation, "S"
"=\\sqrt {181.33333 \\over 5} =6.02218"
tSTAT
"tSTAT= {\\bar{x} - \\mu \\over {\\sigma \\over \\sqrt {n}}} ={21.66667 - 25 \\over {5 \\over \\sqrt {6}}}""=-1.63299"c). Conclusion :
The null hypothesis is not rejected as tSTAT is less than the table value. Hence the​ manufacturer's claim is valid at​ 1% level of significance
Comments
Leave a comment