a. Distributive law A∩(B∪C)=(A∩B)∪(A∩C)
Suppose that x∈A∩(B∪C). Then x∈A and x∈B∪C. By the definition of union, it follows that x∈A and x∈B or x∈C (or both).
In other words, we know that the compound proposition (x∈A)∧((x∈B)∨(x∈C)) is true.
By the distributive law for conjunction over disjunction, it follows that ((x∈A)∧(x∈B))∨((x∈A)∧(x∈C)).
We conclude that either x∈A and x∈B or x∈A and x∈C .
By the definition of intersection, it follows that x∈A∩B or x∈A∩C.
Using the definition of union, we conclude that x∈(A∩B)∪(A∩C). We conclude that A∩(B∪C)⊆(A∩B)∪(A∩C).
Now suppose that x∈A∩(B∪C). Then, by the definition of union, x∈A∩B or x∈A∩C.
By the definition of intersection, it follows that x∈A and x∈B or that x∈A and x∈C.
From this we see that x∈A, and x∈B or x∈C. Consequently, by the definition of union we see that x∈A and x∈B∪C. Furthermore, by the definition of intersection, it follows that x∈A∩(B∪C).
We conclude that (A∩B)∪(A∩C)⊆A∩(B∪C).
This completes the proof of the identity.
The membership table for these combinations of sets is shown in Table.
A11110000B11001100C10101010B∪C11101110A∩(B∪C)11100000
A11110000B11001100C10101010A∩B11000000A∩C10100000(A∩B)∪(A∩C)11100000Because the columns for A∩(B∪C) and (A∩B)∪(A∩C) are the same, the identity is valid.
b. y=x2<x
i.
x2<x=>x2−x<0=>x(x−1)<0
=>x∈(0,1) The opened interval (0,1).
ii. Let x=21. Then
y(21)=(21)2=41<21=x
Comments