p ↔ ¬ (r˅q)
Let us construct the trush table for the formula "p \u2194 \u00ac (r\u02c5q):"
"\\begin{array}{||c|c|c||c|c|c||}\n\\hline\\hline\np & q & r & r\\lor q & \\neg(r\\lor q) &p \u2194 \u00ac (r\\lor q)\\\\\n\\hline\\hline\n0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\\\\n\\hline\n0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 1\\\\\n\\hline\n0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1\\\\\n\\hline\n0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 1\\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1\\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0\\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 &0\\\\\n\\hline\\hline\n\\end{array}"
We conclude that this formula is neither tautology, nor contradiction.
Comments
Leave a comment