Answer to Question #200726 in Psychology for forum

Question

1.          Researchers developed a new measure of resilience. They administered it twice to a sample of 700 primary school students from some of Adelaide’s lower socio-economic suburbs. The first time (T1) was when the students were in grade 3; the second time (T2) was when they were in grade 11. They found that at T1 the new measure correlated positively with a measure of dispositional perseverance, negatively with a measure of learned helplessness, and was not at all related to a measure of aesthetic values. They also found that student’s scores on the new measure correlated at .80 between T1 and T2. Finally, they found that the vast majority of participants who scored high on the new measure of resilience tended to give up when they got a bad mark at school. We would therefore conclude that the new measure…

Answer 1

The answer is A

 

Because it relates to persistence (similar to flexibility) and adversely with learned vulnerability, the construct cogency is robust (contrary to elasticity). Test-retest dependability is also good since the test scores have a high association irrespective of when individuals assume it; they do not change arbitrarily.

Analyzing the standards of the anxiety scores for each question, it is evident that within Measure One, there is more reliability across different questions equated to Measure 2. As a result, in Measure one, there is advanced inner reliability or how dependably review or test items intended to evaluate the same concept essentially do so.

Each of the questions she selected to assess empathy generally differs from what description of kindness they deal with; however, they may be widespread for other studies. They are not a valuable tool for what she is looking for lessons.

The new measure was revealed to have a resilient association between T1 and T2, implicating it has good construct rationality. However, it was not a resilient forecaster of continuing pliability. Learners are inclined to surrender after attaining a lousy mark, presenting poor analytical cogency. Moreover, the variable should have resilient test-retest consistency if employed on an illustration at two diverse time points.