It is claimed that the average weight of babies at birth is 3.4 kg. The average weight of a random sample of 30 newly born babies was determined. It was found out that the average weight was 3.1 kg. Is there a reason to believe that the average weight of babies at birth is not 3.4 kg? Assume that the population standard deviation is 1.1 kg. Use 0.05 level of significance.
"\u03bc=3.4,\u03c3=1.1,n=30,\\bar x=3.1,\u03b1=0.05."
Null and alternative hypotheses:
"H_0:\u03bc=3.4;\\\\\nH_1:\u03bc\\ne3.4."
Because σ is known and "n=30\\ge30," we can use the z-test.
The standardized test statistic is
"z=\\cfrac{\\bar x-\\mu}{\\sigma\/\\sqrt n}=\\cfrac{3.1-3.4}{1.1\/\\sqrt {30}}=-1.49."
In z-table the area corresponding to "z=-1.49" is 0.0681. Because the test is a two-tailed test, the P-value is equal to twice the area to the left of "z=-1.49",
"P=2\\cdot0.0681=0.1362."
Because the P-value is greater than α = 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence at the 5% level of significance to support the claim that the average weight of babies at birth is not 3.4 kg.
Comments
Leave a comment