Question #257992
In a certain experiment to compare two types of drugs A and B, the following results of increase in weights (in kg.) were observed in 5 persons. Person number 1 2 3 4 5 Increase weight in kg. Drug A 3.6 5.5 5.9 4.1 1.4 Drug B 4.5 3.6 5.5. 6.8 2.7 (i) Assuming that the two samples of persons are independent; can we conclude that the drug B is better than drug A? (ii) Also, examine the case when the same set of 5 persons was used in both the drugs.
1
Expert's answer
2021-10-29T04:04:36-0400

Using TI84, the provided sample means are shown below:

Xˉ1=4.1\bar X_1 = 4.1 Xˉ2\bar X_2 =4.529

Also, the provided sample standard deviations are :s1=1.785;s2=1.378s _1 ​ =1.785; s_2 = 1.378

and the sample sizes are n1=5andn_1 = 5 and n2=7n_2 = 7


The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

Ho:μ1=μ2Ho: \mu_1= \mu_2

Ha:μ1μ2Ha: \mu_1≠ \mu_2


This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a t-test for two population means, with two independent samples, with unknown population standard deviations will be used.

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05, and the degrees of freedom are df = df=s12n1+s22n2s12n1n11+s22n2n21df=\frac{\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{n_1}+\frac{s_{2}^{2}}{n_2}}{\frac{\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{n_1}}{n_1-1}+\frac{\frac{s_{2}^{2}}{n_2}}{n_2-1}} =df=1.78525+1.378271.7852551+1.3782771df=\frac{\frac{1.785^{2}}{5}+\frac{1.378^{2}}7}{\frac{\frac{1.785^{2}}5}{5-1}+\frac{\frac{1.378^{2}}{7}}{7-1}}= 7.254

Since it is assumed that the population variances are unequal, the t-statistic is computed as follows:

t=X1X2(s12)n1+s22n2t = \frac{\overline{X1}-\overline{X2}}{\sqrt{\frac{(s1^2)}{n1}+\frac{s2^2}{n2}}} = 4.14..529(1.78512)5+1.37827\frac{4.1-4..529}{\sqrt{\frac{(1.7851^2)}{5}+\frac{1.378^2}{7}}} = -0.45

Hence, it is found that the critical value for this two-tailed test is tc

​=2.348, for α=0.05 and df = 7.254, using t table the rejection region for this two-tailed test is R={t:∣t∣>2.348}.since critical value is greater than test statistic ,it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.

t is concluded that the null hypothesis Ho is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ1 is different than μ2​, at the 0.05 significance level.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS