"\\bar{x_1} = 72 \\\\\n\ns_1 = 9.3 \\\\\n\nn_1 = 13 \\\\\n\n\\bar{x_2} = 80.2 \\\\\n\ns_2 = 10.1 \\\\\n\nn_2 = 13"
The objective of the study is to test does the new booklet appear to be better than the standard version.
Under the claim the null and alternative hypotheses are
"H_0: \\mu_1 = \\mu_2 \\\\\n\nH_1: \\mu_1 < \\mu_2 \\\\"
α=0.05
Test-statistic
"t = \\frac{(\\bar{x_1} - \\bar{x_2}) -(\\mu_1 -\\mu_2)}{\\sqrt{s^2_{p} \\times (\\frac{1}{n_1} + \\frac{1}{n_2})}} \\\\\n\ns^2_{p} = \\frac{(n_1-1) \\times s^2_1 + (n_2-1) \\times s^2_2}{n_1+n_2-2} \\\\\n\n= \\frac{(13-1) \\times 9.3^2 + (13-1) \\times 10.1^2}{13+13-2} \\\\\n\n= 94.25"
Substitute the values in test statistic as shown below:
"t = \\frac{(72.0-80.2) -0}{\\sqrt{94.25(\\frac{1}{13} + \\frac{1}{13})}} \\\\\n\n= -2.15"
Degrees of freedom:
"df= n_1+n_2 -2 = 13+13 -2 = 24"
At the given level of significance 0.05 and the test is left-tailed, then from t-table corresponding to 24 degrees of freedom the critical value is equal to -1.711.
Here, the calculated t value -2.15 is less than the tabulated value -1.711, reject the null hypothesis.
Hence, it can be concluded that new booklet is better than the standard version.
Comments
Leave a comment