Perpetrators of a crime who have been given the maximum sentence of 10 years are believed by a fiscal to have been sentenced to no more than 7 years on average. A random sample of 20 of these crime offenders reveals a mean sentence of 7.6 years with a standard deviation of 2.4 years. Is the fiscal correct in his suspicions at 0.05 level of significance?
"\\mu=7 \\\\\n\nn=20 \\\\\n\n\\bar{x}=7.6 \\\\\n\ns=2.4 \\\\\n\n\u03b1=0.05 \\\\\n\nH_0: \\mu=7 \\\\\n\nH_1: \\mu > 7 \\\\\n\ndf=n-1 = 20-1=19"
Test statistic:
"t= \\frac{\\bar{x}- \\mu}{s \/ \\sqrt{n}} \\\\\n\n= \\frac{7.6-7}{2.4 \/ \\sqrt{20} } \\\\\n\n= \\frac{0.6}{0.5366} \\\\\n\n= 1.118"
Read the t-table value at 5% level of significance at 19 degrees of freedom for Right tailed test is 1.72
t-cal<t-tab
So, we accept H0 and reject H1.
We can conclude, that the fiscal is correct in his suspicions at 0.05 level of significance.
Comments
Leave a comment