A college professor randomly selects 25 freshmen to study the mathematical background of the incoming freshman class. The average SAT score of these 25 students is 565 and the standard deviation is estimated to be 40. Using this information, can the professor reject the null hypothesis that the average test score is 550 or less?
Use a 5 % level of significance.
The provided sample mean is "\\bar{x}=565" and the sample standard deviation is "s=40,"
and the sample size is "n=25."
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0:\\mu\\leq550"
"H_1:\\mu>550"
This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a t-test for one mean, with unknown population standard deviation will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha=0.05," "df=25-1=24," and the critical value for a right-tailed test is "t_c=1.711."
The rejection region for this right-tailed test is "R=t:t>1.711"
The t-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that "t=1.875>1.711=t_c," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu" is greater than 550, at the 0.05 significance level.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is "p=0.036506," and since "p=0.036506<0.05," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu" is greater than 550, at the 0.05 significance level.
Comments
Dear Helper, you have not described the results from last year. There is no sufficient information to answer this question.
uppose the college professor in question 1.1. wants to know whether the mathematical aptitude of freshmen has improved over the past year. He randomly draws 25 SAT mathematics scores from last year’s freshman class and obtains a sample mean of 560 and a sample standard deviation of 35. Compare the results from last year with the results from this year. Do the data offer enough evidence for rejecting the null hypothesis that there is no improvement? Use a 5 % level of significance. (1
Leave a comment