Question #42285

Let S⊆R be non empty . Prove that if a number u in R has the properties (i) for every n∈N the number u-1/n is not an upper bound of S, and (ii) for every number n∈N the number u + 1/n is upper bound S, then u =sup S.

Expert's answer

Answer on Question #42285-Math-Real Analysis

Let SRS \subseteq R be non-empty. Prove that if a number uu in RR has the properties (i) for every nNn \in N the number u1/nu-1/n is not an upper bound of SS, and (ii) for every number nNn \in N the number u+1/nu + 1/n is upper bound SS, then


u=supS.u = \sup S.

Solution

1) Let's prove the first part.

Assume that there is some nNn \in N such that (u1n)\left(u - \frac{1}{n}\right) is an upper bound of SS.

By the definition supremum is the lowest upper bound. But easy to see that (u1n)<u\left(u - \frac{1}{n}\right) < u and thus uu isn't the lowest bound.

So it's not true that there is some nNn \in N such that (u1n)\left(u - \frac{1}{n}\right) is an upper bound of SS.

It means that for every number nNn \in N the number (u1n)\left(u - \frac{1}{n}\right) is not an upper bound of SS.

2) Let's prove the second part.

For any xSx \in S it's true that xux \leq u, because u=supSu = \sup S.

At the same time for any nNn \in N it's true that u<u+1nu < u + \frac{1}{n}.

So we have for any xSx \in S: xu<u+1nx \leq u < u + \frac{1}{n}. From the transitivity of real numbers x<u+1nx < u + \frac{1}{n}.

Thus for any nNn \in N (u+1n)\left(u + \frac{1}{n}\right) is greater than any element of SS, which means that (u+1n)\left(u + \frac{1}{n}\right) is an upper bound.

www.AssignmentExpert.com


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS