. Define the kernel and the image of a linear transformation M : V → W and hence Show that the Kernel and image of M are vector subspaces of V and W respectively.
Let V and W be vector spaces and let "T: V \\rightarrow W" be a linear transformation. Then the image of T denoted as im (T) is defined to be the set
"\\{T(\\vec{v}): \\vec{v} \\in V\\}"
In words, it consists of all vectors in W which equal "T(\\vec{v})" for some "\\vec{v} \\in V" . The kernel, "\\operatorname{ker}(T)" , consists of all "\\vec{v} \\in V" such that "T(\\vec{v})=\\overrightarrow{0}" . That is,
"\\operatorname{ker}(T)=\\{\\vec{v} \\in V: T(\\vec{v})=\\overrightarrow{0}\\}"
Then in fact, both "im (T)" and "\\operatorname{ker}(T)" are subspaces of W and V respectively.
Statement:
Let V, W be vector spaces and let "T: V \\rightarrow W" be a linear transformation. Then "\\operatorname{ker}(T) \\subseteq V and \\operatorname{im}(T) \\subseteq W" . In fact, they are both subspaces.
Proof:
First consider "\\operatorname{ker}(T)" . It is necessary to show that if "\\vec{v}_{1}, \\vec{v}_{2}" are vectors in
"\\operatorname{ker}(T)" and if a, b are scalars, then a "\\vec{v}_{1}+b \\vec{v}_{2}" is also in "\\operatorname{ker}(T)" . But
"T\\left(a \\vec{v}_{1}+b \\vec{v}_{2}\\right)=a T\\left(\\vec{v}_{1}\\right)+b T\\left(\\vec{v}_{2}\\right)=a \\overrightarrow{0}+b \\overrightarrow{0}=\\overrightarrow{0}"
Thus "\\operatorname{ker}(T)" is a subspace of V.
Next suppose "T\\left(\\vec{v}_{1}\\right), T\\left(\\vec{v}_{2}\\right)" are two vectors in im (T). Then if a, b are scalars,
"a T\\left(\\vec{v}_{2}\\right)+b T\\left(\\vec{v}_{2}\\right)=T\\left(a \\vec{v}_{1}+b \\vec{v}_{2}\\right)"
and this last vector is in "\\operatorname{im}(T)" by definition.
Comments
Leave a comment