a) if all u_i are basis thenthey are linearly independent (LI), and thus each u_j cannot be experessed by
linear combination of other u_i, so W is not a Span of {u_i, 1<=i<=n}.
Conversely, suppose that {u_i, 1<=i<=n} are LD (linearly
dependent). Then some u_j can be expressed as linear combination of other
elements {u_i, 1<=i<=n, i <> j}. So, we can exclude u_j from
U and still U is spanning set of W, that contradicts assumption.
b) Suppose U is basis, then U is LI, and moreover it is maximal LI set in W.
So, including any new member to U cannot preserve its linear independence.
Conversely, if we include some v to U and they are now LD then there is nonzero
set of scalars a,b,c,...,d that
au1+bu2+...+cun+dv=0
If d=0, then a*u1+b*u2+...+c*un=0 and then a=b=...=c=0, since U is LI. So
{a,b,c,...,d}={0} a contradiction.
Thus d is nonzero, and so d = (-a/d)u1+(-b/d)u2+...+(-c/d)un belongs to
Span(U).
Thus as any v belongs to Span(U) then W is in Span(U) and obviously then
W=Span(U) and U is basis.
Comments
Leave a comment