Show, by the use of the truth table (truth matrix), that are ¬(P∨(Q∨(¬P→¬R))) and ¬P(Q→R) logically equivalent. (15 points)
Show, by the use of the truth table (truth matrix), that the (p ∨ q) ∨ [(¬p) ∧ (¬q)] is a contradiction.
p: It is below freezing.
q: It is snowing.
Express each of these propositions in complete English sentences.
a) p ∧ q
b) p ∧ ¬q
c) ¬p ∧ ¬q
d) q ∨ p
e) p → q
f) q ∧ ¬p
g) q → p
2. Solve the following.
a) Construct a truth table.
¬p ∧ ( p ↔ ¬q )
b) Construct a truth table.
p → ( q ∧ r )
c) Construct a truth table.
( p → q ) ∨ ( ¬p ↔ r )
d) Find out if the following is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency
( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( ¬p ∧ ¬q )
e) Find out if the following propositions have logical equivalence.
( p ↔ q ) ≡ ( p → q ) ∧ ( q → p )
show that ~p --> (q --> r ) and q --> (p v r) are logically equivalent
For each nonnegative integer 𝑛, let 𝑈_𝑛 = {𝑛, −𝑛}. Find 𝑈_1 ( 𝑈 sub 1). *
List the members of this set: {x | x is the square of an integer and x < 50}
Value of 3^222mod11
Let P(x) denote the statement x > 3. What is the truth value of the quan-
tification ∃xP(x), where the domain consists of all real numbers?
Let N(x) be the statement “x has visited North Dakota,” where the domain consists of the students in your school.
Match each quantification of N(x) given in logical form with and expression in English.
Construct a truth table (truth matrix) for each of these compound proposition
by using truth table (truth matrix), show that each statement is a tautology, contradictory or a contingent statement.