Question #141762
Let R be a binary relation on the set of all positive integers such that R = { (a,b) | a- b is an odd positive integer } Is R reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, transitive? Is R an equivalence relation? A partial ordering relation
1
Expert's answer
2020-11-05T14:19:58-0500

(b) R={(a,b)ab is an odd positive integer }R = \{ (a,b) | a-b \ \text{is an odd positive integer }\}

  • Reflexivity. For all xx we have (x,x)R(x, x) \notin R because xx=0x-x=0 is not a positive integer. The realtion is NOT reflexive.

Symmetry. Let (x,y)R(x, y) \in R. Then xyx-y is a positive integer and yx=(xy)y-x = -(x-y) is negative. Therefore, (y,x)R(y, x) \notin R and the relation is NOT symmetric because the following is always true:

(x,y)R(y,x)R    x=y(x, y) \in R \wedge (y, x) \in R \implies x=y

Antisymmetry. Let (x,y)R(x, y) \in R and (y,x)R(y, x) \in R. Then xyx-y is a positive integer and yxy-x is a positive integer from the definition. Therefore xy>0x-y>0 and yx>0y-x>0. There are no such numbers x,yx, y that satisfy x>yx>y and y>xy>x . Therefore, (x,y)R(y,x)R(x, y) \in R \wedge (y, x) \in R is a contradiction and the relation is antisymmetric because the following is always true:

(x,y)R(y,x)R    x=y(x, y) \in R \wedge (y, x) \in R \implies x=y
  • Transitivity. Let (x,y)R(y,z)R.(x, y) \in R \wedge (y,z) \in R. and xyyxx \subseteq y \wedge y \subseteq x. Then for allaxa \in x we have aya \in y, and therefore aza \in z. Thus xzx \subseteq zThen xyx-y is an odd positive integer and yzy-z is a odd positive integer from the definition. xz=(xy)+(yz)2yx-z = (x-y)+(y-z) - 2y. The difference of two even numbers is even, therefore (x,z)R(x,z) \notin R. The relation is NOT transitive.

Answer. R can be neither an equivalence relation nor a partial ordered set because it is at least not reflexive.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS