(19) Ans : Any integer "n" under( mod 4 ) is
"n\\equiv"0 (mod 4) or "n\\equiv" 1 (mod 4 ) or "n\\equiv" 2 (mod 4) or "n\\equiv" 3 (mod 4)
Again we know that from property of congruences that
If "a\\equiv b" (mod n) , then "a^k\\equiv b^k" (mod n) for any positive integer "k" .
Therefore , "n^2\\equiv 0^2" (mod 4) "\\implies" "n^2\\equiv 0" (mod 4),
"n^2\\equiv 1^2" (mod 4) "\\implies n^2\\equiv 1" (mod 4),
"n^2\\equiv2^2" (mod 4) "\\implies n^2 \\equiv 4" (mod 4) "\\implies n^2 \\equiv 1" (mod 4),
"n^2\\equiv 3^2" (mod 4) "\\implies n^2 \\equiv 9" (mod 4) "\\implies n^2 \\equiv 1" (mod 4)
Hence , for any integer n , "n^2\\equiv 0 \\ or\\ 1" (mod 4)
(20) Ans : Given that "m" is a positive integer in the form "4k+3" , i,e "m=4k+3" for some integer "k \\in \\Z_{\\geq 0}".
Claim : "m" can not be written as a sum of square of two integer .
If possible let "m=a^2+b^2" , where "a" and "b" are two integer .
We know that from (19) , for any integer "n" , "n^2\\equiv 0 \\ or \\ 1" (mod 4)
Therefore , the possible value of "(a^2+b^2)" (mod 4 ) are 0 ,1 and 2 .
But "m" (mod 4 )= 3 , which is a contradiction of "m=a^2+b^2" .
Hence , m is not the sum of square of two integer .
Comments
Leave a comment