We will start from the first given statement,
∀xP(x)∧∃xQ(x)
It doesn't matter if the variables are called x or called y, thus let us recall the variable in the second expression of the conjunction:
"\\equiv"∀xP(x)∧∃yQ(y)
"\\equiv"(∀xP(x))∧(∃yQ(y))
"\\equiv"∀x(P(x)∧(∃yQ(y)))
Using the commutative law,
"\\equiv"∀x((∃yQ(y))∧P(x))
"\\equiv"∀x∃y(Q(y)∧P(x))
Again using the commutative law,
"\\equiv"∀x∃y(P(x)∧Q(y))
Hence we can say that the statement ∀xP(x)∧∃xQ(x) is logically equivalent to ∀x∃y(P(x)∧Q(y)) where all quantifiers have the same nonempty domain.
Comments
Leave a comment