A is sufficient for B can be written as "A \\to B" ---(1)
The negative of A is necessary for the negative of B can be written as "\\neg B \\to \\neg A" ---(2)"(2)\\implies \\neg B \\to \\neg A \\iff \\neg (\\neg B) \\lor \\neg A"
"\\iff \\neg (\\neg B \\land A)" (Using DeMorgan's laws)
"\\iff \\neg(\\neg(\\neg (\\neg B \\land A)))" (As "A \\iff \\neg\\neg A" )
"\\iff \\neg(\\neg B\\land A)" (As "\\neg\\neg A \\iff A" )
"\\iff B \\lor \\neg A\\iff \\neg A \\lor B" (Using DeMorgan's laws)
"\\iff A \\to B \\iff (1)"
Thus, (2) is equivalent to (1).
Hence, the statement 'A is sufficient for B’ is equivalent to ‘the negative of A is necessary for the
negative of B’ is TRUE.
Comments
Leave a comment