In this question you have to construct formal proofs using the natural deduction rules. The Fitch system makes use of these rules.
Remember that De Morgan’s laws and other tautologies are not permissible natural deduction rules. You are also not allowed to use Taut Con, Ana Con or FO Con. It is important to
number your statements, to indicate subproofs and at each step to give the rule that you are using
Question 5.1
Using the natural deduction rules, prove that the following two premises are contradictory:
1 R → (P v Q)
2 R /\ ¬P /\ ¬Q
Question 5.2
Using the natural deduction rules, give a formal proof of
| 1. ¬S
| 2. P → Q
| 3. Q → (R v S)
| 4. P v R
|---
| R
Question 5.3
Prove ∃x[P(x) → ∀yP(y)] from no premises
1
Expert's answer
2020-03-09T11:44:59-0400
Dear Martin, your question requires a lot of work, which neither of our experts is ready to perform for free. We advise you to convert it to a fully qualified order and we will try to help you. Please click the link below to proceed: Submit order
Numbers and figures are an essential part of our world, necessary for almost everything we do every day. As important…
APPROVED BY CLIENTS
"assignmentexpert.com" is professional group of people in Math subjects! They did assignments in very high level of mathematical modelling in the best quality. Thanks a lot
Comments
Leave a comment