a) What happens if we graph both f and on the same set of axes, using the x-axis for the input to both f and ?
first of all f and are inverses of each other.
Let's see if we graph both f and on the same set of axes. Let's denote
b ) [Suggestion: go to www.desmos.com/calculator and type y={-2 < x < 2}, y= {–2 < x < 2}, and y = x {–2 < x < 2}, and describe the relationship between the three curves.] Then post your own example discussing the difficulty of graph both f and on the same set of axes.
y= {-2 < x < 2}, y= {–2 < x < 2}, and y = x {–2 < x < 2}. Let's see their graphs on www.desmos.com/calculator.
The following properties can be seen clearly from the graph
We find f(g(x)) = and g(f(x)) = = x
f(g(x)) = g(f(x))
the domain of is (-, + ) and its range is (- , + ),
the domain of is (- , + ) and its range is (- , + )
it can be seen the domain of f is equal to the range of g and the range of f is equal to the domain of g.
my own example
y = and y = , y = -
we find f(g(x)) = and g(f(x)) = = x
f(g(x)) = g(f(x))
the domain of is (- , + ) and the range is [0, + )
-x^(1/2) and have the domain [0, + ) and the range (- , + )
it can be seen the domain of f is equal to the range of g and the range of f is equal to the domain of g
c) Suppose f:R R is a function from the set of real numbers to the same set with f(x)=x+1. We write to represent f f and f.
Is it true that f = f ? Why? Is the set {g:R R l g f=f o g} infinite? Why?
= f f = x+1+1 = x+2
= x+1+2 = x+3
= x+2+1 = x+3, so yes they are the same;
= = x+3
= x+4
...
Suppose = x+n,
= x+1+n = x+(n+1)
so the pattern holds by induction,
F Finv = x so when you graph them on
the same plot, they shall be SYMMETRIC about
the line y=x
Comments