Search & Filtering
Law
Political Corruption
What is the global issue you are looking at?
● What do you think is so important about the issue? Both to yourself and the world?
● What other global issues does it impact upon?
● What is the relevant history of this issue?
● What are likely future outcomes of this global issue if it continues?
● What solution is possible?
● What is stopping this solution from happening?
What is the global issue you are looking at?
● What do you think is so important about the issue? Both to yourself and the world?
● What other global issues does it impact upon?
● What is the relevant history of this issue?
● What are likely future outcomes of this global issue if it continues?
● What solution is possible?
● What is stopping this solution from happening?
Law
1.Two days before lectures commences, Andile and Siyanda move into their rented house only to find there is poor water supply and most of the celling is missing. In addition, the stove connection appears to have been burnt and cannot be used. Jim, the landlord, refuses to assist, saying that the lease makes Andile and Siyanda responsible for maintenance.
Discuss what remedies is available for Andile and Siyanda
Law
Assume for the purposes of this question that Julie and Suresh conclude an
agreement in terms of which they agree that Julie will pay Suresh the amount of
R50 000 to murder her husband, Alex.
Q.3.5.1 Will this contract be valid and enforceable? Substantiate and explain your
answer by making reference to:
• The relevant contractual requirement/s that are in question;
• Defining or explaining the correct requirement/s; and
• The reasoning (rationale) for the correct answer.
Please note — Nomarks will be allocated for "yes" or "no". The marks are
awarded with reference to the substantiation/ motivation provided.
(4)
Q.3.5.2 Briefly discuss the legal consequences of an agreement such as the one
between Julie and Suresh.
agreement in terms of which they agree that Julie will pay Suresh the amount of
R50 000 to murder her husband, Alex.
Q.3.5.1 Will this contract be valid and enforceable? Substantiate and explain your
answer by making reference to:
• The relevant contractual requirement/s that are in question;
• Defining or explaining the correct requirement/s; and
• The reasoning (rationale) for the correct answer.
Please note — Nomarks will be allocated for "yes" or "no". The marks are
awarded with reference to the substantiation/ motivation provided.
(4)
Q.3.5.2 Briefly discuss the legal consequences of an agreement such as the one
between Julie and Suresh.
Law
Consider the following facts and draw the diagram:
Q.4.1 Roscoe is the only son of Elliot. Rosco is married to Shirona. Prior their
marriage, Shirona had Thandi out of wedlock and Rosco had Biniam
from his previous marriage. Together Rosco and Shirona have two
children, a girl named Fatima and a boy named Cephas. Thandi is the
mother of Xavier.
Q.4.1 Roscoe is the only son of Elliot. Rosco is married to Shirona. Prior their
marriage, Shirona had Thandi out of wedlock and Rosco had Biniam
from his previous marriage. Together Rosco and Shirona have two
children, a girl named Fatima and a boy named Cephas. Thandi is the
mother of Xavier.
Law
Q.2.5 With regards to consent to marry, an error in negotio mean: (2)
(1) an error concerning the identity of one of the parties;
(2) an error in the marriage vows in terms of s30 of the Marriage
Act ;
(3) an error regarding the juristic act;
(4) an error regarding the lobola negotiated;
(5) an error regarding the place of marriage in terms of s29 of
the Marriage Act.
(1) an error concerning the identity of one of the parties;
(2) an error in the marriage vows in terms of s30 of the Marriage
Act ;
(3) an error regarding the juristic act;
(4) an error regarding the lobola negotiated;
(5) an error regarding the place of marriage in terms of s29 of
the Marriage Act.
Law
Q.2.4 The Maartens v Maartens 1952 case is an example of a ____________ (2)
(1) a void marriage;
(2) a voidable marriage;
(3) a putative marriage;
(4) a sham marriage;
(5) none of the above
(1) a void marriage;
(2) a voidable marriage;
(3) a putative marriage;
(4) a sham marriage;
(5) none of the above
Law
Q.2.2 An objection to a marriage will result in the marriage ceremony being
suspended if the objection:‐
(2)
(1) poses a legal impediment to conclusion of a valid marriage;
(2) is raised by the groom’s ex‐girlfriend with whom he as
children;
(3) is of such a nature that the bride would not accepted the
groom’s proposal;
(4) is of such a nature as to render the prospect of a happy
marriage impossible
(5) all of the above
suspended if the objection:‐
(2)
(1) poses a legal impediment to conclusion of a valid marriage;
(2) is raised by the groom’s ex‐girlfriend with whom he as
children;
(3) is of such a nature that the bride would not accepted the
groom’s proposal;
(4) is of such a nature as to render the prospect of a happy
marriage impossible
(5) all of the above
Law
Q.2.1 In Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie 2006 (1) SA 524 (CC) declared
____________ to be unconstitutional:
(2)
(1) marriage vows;
(2) common law definition of marriage;
(3) heterosexual marriage;
(4) Marriage Act;
(5) the conduct of the Minister of Home Affairs
____________ to be unconstitutional:
(2)
(1) marriage vows;
(2) common law definition of marriage;
(3) heterosexual marriage;
(4) Marriage Act;
(5) the conduct of the Minister of Home Affairs
Law
Q.1.2 Explain why spouses married to each other in community of property
have limited capacity to contract.
have limited capacity to contract.
Law
Q.1.1 Using your own words as far as possible (paraphrasing), briefly explain
the following statement: “Separate property: assets that do not fall
into the joint estate.”
the following statement: “Separate property: assets that do not fall
into the joint estate.”
