Write this in your own words.
9. Science has no dogma. Explanations of phenomenon are not accepted on
faith. This links closely to the previous point. The body of knowledge produced
by scientists will not change based on the religious principles of society. There
is not only one way to produce scientific knowledge. There is a constant need
to question the knowledge that has been previously produced.
10. Science cannot make moral or aesthetic decisions, but only describes the
natural world. How this knowledge is used does not fall within the domain of
science. Science merely shows what is possible. It is the ethical and moral
responsibility of society to provide guidelines that determine if we should pursue these possibilities.
9. Science has no doctrine. Clarifications of peculiarity are not acknowledged on
confidence. This joins near the past point. The group of information created
by researchers won't change in light of the strict standards of society. There
isn't just a single method for creating logical information. There is a steady need
to scrutinize the information that has been recently created.
10. Science can't settle on moral or tasteful choices, however just portrays the
regular world. How this information is utilized doesn't fall inside the space of
science. Science just shows what is conceivable. It is the moral and moral
obligation of society to give rules that decide whether we should seek after these conceivable outcomes.
Comments
Leave a comment