Now that you've heard the Task Force's opinions, what do you think the next step should be?
Are you ready to make a recommendation, or do you need more information first?
▲
Do you have enough information to make a recommendation on the Eva Wesley case? If so, what should be done? If not, what additional information do you need before you can make a recommendation?
(Maximum 2500 characters)
What knowledge gaps do you see in this task force that may impact their ability to help teens like Eva Wesley? How would you recommend they fill these knowledge gaps?
The Task Force defines shared decision-making as a particular process of decision-making by the patient and clinician in which the patient: Understands the risk or seriousness of the disease or condition to be prevented. Understands the preventive service, including the risks, benefits, alternatives, and uncertainties. It is especially important to have the task force develop options, rather than a recommendation, if the output is going to be fed back to your board of directors for dialogue and decision making purposes. Define the timeline. Although a task force could be created for many purposes, most are created to solve a problem or address a challenge. The critical first step is to clearly define the problem. Although the task force itself will engage in a more thorough root problem analysis, some thought to root causes is advisable at this stage. Define the outcome (s).
Comments
Leave a comment