In your assigned readings, you learned how inductive and deductive reasoning are used to answer questions about life. Briefly compare and contrast each type of reasoning as they apply to biological investigation. Which, if any, type of reasoning is best used to establish cause and effect relationships? Explain your rationale using one or more examples.
Reasoning is define as a the dimensions for a person to make sense of things to found & verify facts, To rationaly work through data, information, facts, and beliefs.
It is the process of making decisions and findings from facts or premises.
To put it plain and simple; it is the ability to logically think from perceived premise to a logical conclusion
There are two type of reasoning
Example in normal life
Example of deductive reasoning: All men are mortal, Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is mortal. The premise "all men are mortal" is based on the observation that historically all humans die eventually. That is an inductive generalization.
Mainly it is also know that all apples are fruits, and a Granny Smith is an apple. Therefore, the Granny Smith has to be a fruit. This is an example of syllogism, a form ofdeductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is a type of logic where general statements, or premises, are used to form a specific conclusion.
In short
Biological Investigation
example in biological experiment
Step 1. Make observations
Step 2. Form a hypothesis- inductive reasoning is used
Step 3. Make a prediction
Step 4. Perform an experiment.
Step 5. Analyze the results of the experiment.
Step 6. Draw a conclusion.
Step 7. Report your results
Comments
Leave a comment