Explanations & Calculations
- )
- Since all the sections are in the same plane there is no need of assessing the y component of the new center of mass which is obvious as it is not even questioned.
- The x component by the way should lie on the line passing through both the centers of the disc & the hole.
- Before drilling the hole, the center of mass was in the center of the disc & it should shift to the side opposite to where the hole is because more mass is now concentrated on that side.
- With all these in mind, we can sketch something like,
- Imagine the masses of the components are according to the picture.
- Then balancing torques about the center of the disc, we are able to get the result
Mgxx=mg×2.5=M2.5m
- Since there is no evidence for the masses of each component the answer can be given as the new center of mass lies on the opposite side of the hole & the center of the disc on the line that passes through the centers.
2)
- Consider the velocity of the 0.1 kg ball before the collision to be (already given) 6.30→ and those of the 0.1kg & 0.3kg balls after the collision to be u→andv→ respectively.
- Then applying linear momentum conservation,
0.1×6.30+0.3×06.3=0.1u+0.3v=u+3v⋯(1)
- Since the collision is elastic, the kinetic energies of the balls are also conserved. Then,
20.1×(6.30)239.69=20.1u2+20.3v2=u2+3v2⋯(2)
- Solving for v yeilds,
v=+3.15ms−1 (along positive x direction)
- Then solving for u in (1),
u=−3.15ms−1 (along negative x direction)
Comments