Medical aid board wants to find if the mean time to settle medical claims of members differs between 2 major medical schemes. The sample mean time to settlement was 10.8 days. Population standard deviation of 3.2 days for 1 and the other 12.4 days with population deviation 2.3 days
Formulate the null and alternative hypothesis and test this hypothesis at the 1% significance level and draw a conclusion?
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0:\\mu_1=\\mu_2"
"H_1:\\mu_1\\not=\\mu_2"
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, and a z-test for two means, with known population standard deviations will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is "\\alpha = 0.01," and the critical value for a two-tailed test is "z_c=2.5758."
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is "R = \\{z: |z| > 2.5758\\}."
The z-statistic is computed as follows:
"=\\dfrac{10.8-12.4}{\\sqrt{3.2^2\/14+2.3^2\/15}}\\approx-1.5367"
Since it is observed that "|z| = 1.5367 \\le 2.5758=z_c ," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Using the P-value approach:
The p-value is "p=2P(Z<-1.5367)=0.124369," and since "p = 0.124369 \\ge 0.01=\\alpha," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu_1" is different than "\\mu_2," at the "\\alpha = 0.01" significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment