Question #206476

The mean lifetime for a sample of 125 lamps is 1205 hours with standard deviation 105 hours. However, the company claims that their lamps average lifetime is difference from 1300 hours. Test the claim at 1% level of significance.


1
Expert's answer
2021-06-14T16:14:40-0400

The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

H0:μ=1300H_0:\mu=1300

H1:μ1300H_1:\mu\not=1300

This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a t-test for one mean, with unknown population standard deviation, using the sample standard deviation, will be used.

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.01,\alpha=0.01, and the critical value for a two-tailed test for α=0.01\alpha=0.01 and df=n1=1251=124df=n-1=125-1=124 degrees of freedom is tc=2.61606.t_c=2.61606. The rejection region for this two-tailed test is R={t:t>2.61606}.R=\{t: |t|>2.61606\}.

The t-statistic is computed as follows:


t=xˉμs/n=12051300105/12510.11555t=\dfrac{\bar{x}-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{1205-1300}{105/\sqrt{125}}\approx-10.11555

Since it is observed that t=10.11555>2.61606=tc,|t|=10.11555>2.61606=t_c, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ\mu is different than 1300, at the α=0.01\alpha=0.01 significance level.


Using the P-value approach: The p-value for two-tailed, t=10.11555,df=124,t=-10.11555, df=124, α=0.01\alpha=0.01 is p=0,p=0, and since p=0<0.01,p=0<0.01, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ\mu is different than 1300, at the α=0.01\alpha=0.01 significance level.



Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS