1) Recent business graduates currently employed in full-time positions were surveyed. Family backgrounds were self-classified as relatively high or low socioeconomic status. For a random sample of 16 high- socioeconomic status recent business graduates, mean total compensation was $34500 and the sample standard deviation was $8520. For an independent random sample of 9 low-socioeconomic status recent business graduates, mean total compensation was $31,499 and the sample standard deviation was $7,521.
A) Find a 90% confidence interval for the difference between the two populations means.
B) Test at 1% level of significance the means of the two populations are not equal.
A) Assume that the population variances are unequal, so then the number of degrees of freedom is computed as follows:
The critical value for "\\alpha=0.1" and "df=18.56027" degrees of freedom is "t_{1-\\alpha\/2, n-1}=1.7312."
Since we assume that the population variances are unequal, the standard error is computed as follows:
"=\\sqrt{\\dfrac{(8520)^2}{16}+\\dfrac{(7521)^2}{9}}=3289.673"
The corresponding confidence interval is computed as shown below:
"=(34500-31499-1.7312\\times 3289.673,"
"34500-31499+1.7312\\times 3289.673)"
"=(-2693.424, 8695.424)"
Therefore, based on the data provided, the 90% confidence interval for the difference between the population means "\\mu_1-\\mu_2" is "-2693.424<\\mu_1-\\mu_2<8695.424," which indicates that we are 90%
confident that the true difference between population means is contained by the interval "(-2693.424, 8695.424)"
B) The provided sample means are "\\bar{x}_1=34500" and "\\bar{x}_2=31499."
The provided sample standard deviations are "s_1=8520, s_2=7521."
The sample sizes are "n_1=16" and "n_2=9."
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
"H_0: \\mu_1=\\mu_2"
"H_1: \\mu_1\\not=\\mu_2"
This corresponds to two-tailed test, for which a t-test for two population means, with two independent samples, with unknown population standard deviations will be used.
The number of degrees of freedom are "df=18.56027," and the significance level is "\\alpha=0.01."
Based on the information provided, the critical value for a two-tailed test is "t_c=2.868."
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is "R=\\{t:|t|>2.868\\}"
The t-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that "t=0.912<2.868=t_c," it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu_1" is different than "\\mu_2," at the 0.01 significance level.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value "df=18.56027, t=0.912," "two-tailed," is "p=0.3733," and since "p=0.3733\\geq0.01," it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean "\\mu_1" is different than "\\mu_2" at the 0.01 significance level.
Comments
Leave a comment