Question #163262

1)     Recent business graduates currently employed in full-time positions were surveyed. Family backgrounds were self-classified as relatively high or low socioeconomic status. For a random sample of 16 high- socioeconomic status recent business graduates, mean total compensation was $34500 and the sample standard deviation was $8520. For an independent random sample of 9 low-socioeconomic status recent business graduates, mean total compensation was $31,499 and the sample standard deviation was $7,521.

A)   Find a 90% confidence interval for the difference between the two populations means. 

B)    Test at 1% level of significance the means of the two populations are not equal.



1
Expert's answer
2021-02-24T06:52:59-0500

A) Assume that the population variances are unequal, so then the number of degrees of freedom is computed as follows:


df=(s12/n1+s22/n2)2(s12/n1)2n11+(s22/n2)2n21=18.56027df=\dfrac{(s_1^2/n_1+s_2^2/n_2)^2}{\dfrac{(s_1^2/n_1)^2}{n_1-1}+\dfrac{(s_2^2/n_2)^2}{n_2-1}}=18.56027

The critical value for α=0.1\alpha=0.1 and df=18.56027df=18.56027 degrees of freedom is t1α/2,n1=1.7312.t_{1-\alpha/2, n-1}=1.7312.

Since we assume that the population variances are unequal, the standard error is computed as follows:


se=s12n1+s22n2se=\sqrt{\dfrac{s_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{s_2^2}{n_2}}

=(8520)216+(7521)29=3289.673=\sqrt{\dfrac{(8520)^2}{16}+\dfrac{(7521)^2}{9}}=3289.673

The corresponding confidence interval is computed as shown below:


CI=(x1ˉx2ˉtc×se,x1ˉx2ˉ+tc×se)CI=(\bar{x_1}-\bar{x_2}-t_c\times se, \bar{x_1}-\bar{x_2}+t_c\times se)

=(34500314991.7312×3289.673,=(34500-31499-1.7312\times 3289.673,

3450031499+1.7312×3289.673)34500-31499+1.7312\times 3289.673)

=(2693.424,8695.424)=(-2693.424, 8695.424)

Therefore, based on the data provided, the 90% confidence interval for the difference between the population means μ1μ2\mu_1-\mu_2 is 2693.424<μ1μ2<8695.424,-2693.424<\mu_1-\mu_2<8695.424, which indicates that we are 90%

confident that the true difference between population means is contained by the interval (2693.424,8695.424)(-2693.424, 8695.424)


B) The provided sample means are xˉ1=34500\bar{x}_1=34500 and xˉ2=31499.\bar{x}_2=31499.

The provided sample standard deviations are s1=8520,s2=7521.s_1=8520, s_2=7521.

The sample sizes are n1=16n_1=16 and n2=9.n_2=9.

The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

H0:μ1=μ2H_0: \mu_1=\mu_2

H1:μ1μ2H_1: \mu_1\not=\mu_2

This corresponds to two-tailed test, for which a t-test for two population means, with two independent samples, with unknown population standard deviations will be used.

The number of degrees of freedom are df=18.56027,df=18.56027, and the significance level is α=0.01.\alpha=0.01.

Based on the information provided, the critical value for a two-tailed test is tc=2.868.t_c=2.868.

The rejection region for this two-tailed test is R={t:t>2.868}R=\{t:|t|>2.868\}

The t-statistic is computed as follows:


t=xˉ1xˉ2s12n1+s22n2=34500314998520216+752129=0.912t=\dfrac{\bar{x}_1-\bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}=\dfrac{34500-31499}{\sqrt{\dfrac{8520^2}{16}+\dfrac{7521^2}{9}}}=0.912

Since it is observed that t=0.912<2.868=tc,t=0.912<2.868=t_c, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ1\mu_1 is different than μ2,\mu_2, at the 0.01 significance level.

Using the P-value approach: The p-value df=18.56027,t=0.912,df=18.56027, t=0.912, twotailed,two-tailed, is p=0.3733,p=0.3733, and since p=0.37330.01,p=0.3733\geq0.01, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ1\mu_1 is different than μ2\mu_2 at the 0.01 significance level.




Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!
LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS