Answer to Question #133993 in Statistics and Probability for Margaret

Question #133993
You are tasked with investigating whether fake news media platform and personality are independent. Consider the table below to help you with your task.
Celebrity. C/ Politician .P/ Sport Star .SS/ Total
Social Media .SM/ 1800 700 515 3015
Traditional Media. TM/ 485 350 150 985
Total 2285 1050 775 4000

Consider the following statement below.
(A) We reject the null hypothesis.
(B) We do not the reject the null hypothesis.
(C) Media platform and personality are independent.
Which statements are correct?
1. Only A
2. Only B
3. Only C.
4. A and C only.
5. B and C only.
1
Expert's answer
2020-09-21T14:49:35-0400
CPSSTotalSM18007005153015TM485350150985Total228510506654000\def\arraystretch{1.5} \begin{array}{c:c:c:c:c} & C & P & SS & Total \\ \hline SM & 1800 & 700 & 515 & 3015 \\ \hdashline TM & 485 & 350 & 150 & 985 \\ \hdashline Total & 2285 & 1050 & 665 & 4000 \end{array}

The expected values are computed in terms of row and column totals. In fact, the formula is


Eij=Ri×CjT,E_{ij}=\dfrac{R_i\times C_j}{T},

where RiR_i corresponds to the total sum of elements in row i,i, CjC_j corresponds to the total sum of elements in column j,j, and TT is the grand total.


E11=3015×22854000=1722.31875E_{11}=\dfrac{3015\times 2285}{4000}=1722.31875


E12=3015×10504000=791.4375E_{12}=\dfrac{3015\times 1050}{4000}=791.4375



E13=3015×6654000=501.24375E_{13}=\dfrac{3015\times 665}{4000}=501.24375

E21=985×22854000=562.68125E_{21}=\dfrac{985\times 2285}{4000}=562.68125

E22=985×10504000=258.5625E_{22}=\dfrac{985\times 1050}{4000}=258.5625

E23=985×6654000=163.75625E_{23}=\dfrac{985\times 665}{4000}=163.75625

The table below shows the calculations to obtain the table with expected values:


Expected ValuesCPSSTotalSM1722.32791.44501.243015TM562.68258.56163.76985Total228510506654000\def\arraystretch{1.5} \begin{array}{c:c:c:c:c} Expected\ Values & C & P & SS & Total \\ \hline SM & 1722.32 & 791.44& 501.24 & 3015 \\ \hdashline TM & 562.68 & 258.56 & 163.76 & 985 \\ \hdashline Total & 2285 & 1050 & 665 & 4000 \end{array}

Based on the observed and expected values, the squared distances can be computed according to the following formula: (EO)2E.\dfrac{(E-O)^2}{E}. The table with squared distances is shown below:


Squared DistancesCPSSSM3.50410.5640.378TM10.72432.3361.156\def\arraystretch{1.5} \begin{array}{c:c:c:c} Squared\ Distances & C & P & SS \\ \hline SM & 3.504 & 10.564 & 0.378 \\ \hdashline TM & 10.724 & 32.336 & 1.156 \end{array}

The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:

H0:H_0: The two variables are independent.

H1:H_1: The two variables are dependent.

This corresponds to a Chi-Square test of independence.

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.05,\alpha=0.05, the number of degrees of freedom is df=(21)×(31)=2,df=(2-1)\times(3-1)=2, so then the rejection region for this test is R={χ2:χ2>5.991}.R=\{\chi^2:\chi^2>5.991\}.

The Chi-Squared statistic is computed as follows:


χ2=3.504+10.724+10.564+32.336+\chi^2=3.504+10.724+10.564+32.336+

+0.378+1.156=58.661+0.378+1.156=58.661

Since it is observed that χ2=58.661>5.991=χc2,\chi^2=58.661>5.991=\chi_c^2, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the two variables are dependent, at the 0.05 significance level.


1. Only A statement is correct.



Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!

Leave a comment