The breaking strengths of cables produced by manufacturer have a mean of 1800 Kg and a standard deviation of 100 Kg. By a new technique in the manufacturing process, it is claimed that breaking strength can be increased. To test this claim, a sample of 50 cables is tested and it is found that the mean breaking strength is 1850Kg. Can we support the claim at the 0.01 significance level?
Consider Z-test for one population mean with known population standard deviation
The provided sample mean is and the known population standard deviation is and the sample size is
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
This corresponds to a right-tailed test, for which a z-test for one mean, with known population standard deviation will be used.
Based on the information provided, the significance level is and the critical value for a right-tailed test is
The rejection region for this right-tailed test is
The z-statistic is computed as follows:
Since it is observed that it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is and since it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
It is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean is greater than 1800, at the 0.01 significance level.
We conclude that a new technique can improve the break strength.
Comments