Consider the path x(t)=tj,y(t)=kti, which approaches to (0,0) as t tends to 0.
If f(x,t) is a continuous at (0,0) then f(x(t),y(t))=(1+kj)−1tmj+ni−ij must have a bounded limit as t tends to 0. Hence it must be mj+ni−ij≥0 . and then
t→0limf(x(t),y(t))={0(1+kj)−1ifmj+ni−ij>0ifmj+ni−ij=0}
So, if mj+ni−ij=0 then the limit value varies depending on k, hence, (x,y)→(0,0)limf(x,y) doesn't exist and the function may not be continuous at (0,0).
So, the necessity of condition mj+ni−ij>0 or, equivalently, im+jn>1 is proved.
Let us show now that this condition is sufficient for the function f(x,y) to be continuous at (0,0).
Let s=im+jn, p=mis, q=njs. Then p1+q1=1.
Since i and j are even positive integers, xi+yj=∣x∣i+∣y∣j for every x,y.
By Young's inequality for products we have
∣x∣i+∣y∣j=(∣x∣m/s)p+(∣y∣n/s)q=p(p1/p∣x∣m/s)p+q(q1/q∣y∣n/s)q≥p1/pq1/q∣x∣m/s∣y∣n/s=C(∣x∣m∣y∣n)1/s
where C=p1/pq1/q. So,
∣f(x,y)∣=∣x∣i+∣y∣j∣x∣m∣y∣n≤C−1(∣x∣m∣y∣n)1−1/s→0
Therefore, if mj+ni−ij>0 then f(x,y)→0=f(0,0) as (x,y) tends to (0,0), hence, f(x,y) is continuous at (0,0).
Comments