Question #137713

a) Let D be a nonempty subset of R, bounded above. Is M = sup(D) a limit point of D? Explain.

b) Let the function g : R → R be bounded. Define f(x) = 1 + 4x + x^2(g(x)). Prove that

f(0) = 1 and f'(0) = 4. (You may not assume g is differentiable.)

c) Suppose that the function f : R → R is differentiable and that there is a bounded sequence {xn} with xn doesnt= xm if n doesnt= m, such that f(xn) = 0 for every index n. Show that there is a point x0 at which f(x0) = 0 and f'(x0) = 0. (Hint: Use Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem.)


Expert's answer

a)

let us an example;

D = {1,2,3,4}

D is non empty

D is bounded above

Supremum of D = 4

'4' is not a limit point of D

for ∈\in = 1/2

4 ∈\in (4 - 1/2, 4+ 1/2)∉\notin 4

therefore is not limit point

supremum of D is not a limit point for D

b)

f(x) = 1 +4x + x 2 (gx)

if x = 0

f(x) = 1 + 0 +0

f(x) = 1

therefore g is bounded

so g * 0 = 0

f(0) = 1

lim ( f(x) - f(0))/(x - 0)

x →\to 0

= (1 + 4x + x2 - 1)/ x

= lim 4 + x

x→\to0

= 4

thus lim (f(x) - f(0))/(x - 0) = 4 which is finite value

x→\to 0

so we have f'(0) = 2

c)

Let f: IR→\to IR be a function, then lim f(x) = ρ\rho ∈\isin IR if and only if for any sequence (fn) in IR with n→\toa, f(m/ →\to ρ\rho n→\to a

Given f : IR→\toIR is differentiable and x(n) ⊂\subset IR with x(n) ∉\notin x(m) if n ∉\notin m such that f(xn) = 0 ∀\forall n ∈\isin IN and xn is bounded sequence. Hence by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, ∃\exist a subsequence (xnR) of (xn) such that (xnR) convergent and converges to xo ∈\in IR

Now f'(x0) = lim (f(x) - f(x0))/(x - x0) exist

x→\to x0


we know xnR→\to x0 and hence;


lim (f(xnR) - f(x0))/ (xnR - x0)

R→\to ∅\empty

lim (0 - 0)/ (xnR - x0)

R→\to 0

= 0

Hence f'(x0) = lim (f(x) - f(x0))/ (x - x0)

x→\tox0

= lim (f(xnR) - f(x0)) / (xnR - x0)

R→∅\to\empty

= 0

Therefore f'(x0) = 0


LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS