a) Let D be a nonempty subset of R, bounded above. Is M = sup(D) a limit point of D? Explain.
b) Let the function g : R → R be bounded. Define f(x) = 1 + 4x + x^2(g(x)). Prove that
f(0) = 1 and f'(0) = 4. (You may not assume g is differentiable.)
c) Suppose that the function f : R → R is differentiable and that there is a bounded sequence {xn} with xn doesnt= xm if n doesnt= m, such that f(xn) = 0 for every index n. Show that there is a point x0 at which f(x0) = 0 and f'(x0) = 0. (Hint: Use Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem.)
a)
let us an example;
D = {1,2,3,4}
D is non empty
D is bounded above
Supremum of D = 4
'4' is not a limit point of D
for "\\in" = 1/2
4 "\\in" (4 - 1/2, 4+ 1/2)"\\notin" 4
therefore is not limit point
supremum of D is not a limit point for D
b)
f(x) = 1 +4x + x 2 (gx)
if x = 0
f(x) = 1 + 0 +0
f(x) = 1
therefore g is bounded
so g * 0 = 0
f(0) = 1
lim ( f(x) - f(0))/(x - 0)
x "\\to" 0
= (1 + 4x + x2 - 1)/ x
= lim 4 + x
x"\\to"0
= 4
thus lim (f(x) - f(0))/(x - 0) = 4 which is finite value
x"\\to" 0
so we have f'(0) = 2
c)
Let f: IR"\\to" IR be a function, then lim f(x) = "\\rho" "\\isin" IR if and only if for any sequence (fn) in IR with n"\\to"a, f(m/ "\\to" "\\rho" n"\\to" a
Given f : IR"\\to"IR is differentiable and x(n) "\\subset" IR with x(n) "\\notin" x(m) if n "\\notin" m such that f(xn) = 0 "\\forall" n "\\isin" IN and xn is bounded sequence. Hence by Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, "\\exist" a subsequence (xnR) of (xn) such that (xnR) convergent and converges to xo "\\in" IR
Now f'(x0) = lim (f(x) - f(x0))/(x - x0) exist
x"\\to" x0
we know xnR"\\to" x0 and hence;
lim (f(xnR) - f(x0))/ (xnR - x0)
R"\\to" "\\empty"
lim (0 - 0)/ (xnR - x0)
R"\\to" 0
= 0
Hence f'(x0) = lim (f(x) - f(x0))/ (x - x0)
x"\\to"x0
= lim (f(xnR) - f(x0)) / (xnR - x0)
R"\\to\\empty"
= 0
Therefore f'(x0) = 0
Comments
Leave a comment