As, [(p→q)∧(¬p→r)]→(q∨r)[(p → q) ∧ (¬p → r)] \to (q ∨ r)[(p→q)∧(¬p→r)]→(q∨r) is a Tautology (always true) ;
Thus; the implication holds.
∴(p→q)∧(¬p→r)⇒(q∨r)\therefore (p → q) ∧ (¬p → r) ⇒ (q ∨ r)∴(p→q)∧(¬p→r)⇒(q∨r)
It is valid as the condtional is a Tautolgy; hece the Implication holds.