a)Since "X\\subset X\\cup Y" and "Y\\subset X\\cup Y", we have "f[X]\\subset f[X\\cup Y]" and "f[Y]\\subset f[X\\cup Y]" , that is "f[X]\\cup f[Y]\\subset f[X\\cup Y]" .
Now we prove that "f[X\\cup Y]\\subset f[X]\\cup f[Y]" .
Indeed, if "f[X\\cup Y]=\\varnothing", then "f[X\\cup Y]\\subset f[X]\\cup f[Y]".
Else let "u\\in f[X\\cup Y]" , then there is "v\\in X\\cup Y" such that "u=f(v)" . So if "v\\in X", then "u=f(v)\\in f[X]" , and if "v\\in Y", then "u=f(v)\\in f[Y]" . In both cases we have "u\\in f[X]\\cup f[Y]" .
Therefore "f[X\\cup Y]\\subset f[X]\\cup f[Y]" .
Since "f[X\\cup Y]\\subset f[X]\\cup f[Y]" and "f[X]\\cup f[Y]\\subset f[X\\cup Y]" , we have "f[X]\\cup f[Y]= f[X\\cup Y]" .
b)Since "X\\cap Y\\subset X" and "X\\cap Y\\subset Y" , we have "f[X\\cap Y]\\subset f[X]" and "f[X\\cap Y]\\subset f[Y]" , that is "f[X\\cap Y]\\subset f[X]\\cap f[Y]" , but there are examples where "f[X\\cap Y]\\not\\supset f[X]\\cap f[Y]" (Indeed, if "a\\in f[X]\\cap f[Y]", then there are "b\\in X" and "c\\in Y" such that "a=f(b)=f(c)". But it does not imply that there is "d\\in X\\cap Y" such that "a=f(d)"). One of these examples is "f\\colon \\{1,2,3\\}\\to\\{1,2\\}", where "f(1)=f(3)=1" and "f(2)=2" . We have "f[\\{2\\}]=\\{2\\}", but "f[\\{1,2\\}]\\cap f[\\{3,2\\}]=\\{1,2\\}".
Comments
Leave a comment