prove a --> ( b V c ) using contradiction method and combination of inference rules and equivalence laws from these premises : 1. a --> ( d V b ) 2. d --> c
Let us prove using the method by contradiction.
Suppose that the premises "a \\to ( d \\lor b )" and "d \\to c" are true, but the conclusion "a \\to( b \\lor c )" is false.
The definition of implication implies "a" is true and "b\\lor c" is false, and hence definition of disjunction implies "b" is false and "c" is false. Since "d \\to c" is true and "c" is false, we conclude that "d" is false. Consequently, "d\\lor b" is false, and thus "a \\to ( d \\lor b )" is false. This contradiction proves the premises "a \\to ( d \\lor b )" and "d \\to c" imply the conclusion "a \\to( b \\lor c )."
Comments
Leave a comment