Which of these relations on the set of all functions from Z to Z are equivalence
relations? Determine the properties of an equivalence relation that the others
lack.
a) {(f, g) | f (1) = g(1)}
b) {(f, g) | f (0) = g(0) or f (1) = g(1)}
c) {(f, g) | f (x) − g(x) = 1 for all x ∈ Z}
d) {(f, g) | for some C ∈ Z, for all x ∈ Z, f (x) − g(x) = C}
e) {(f, g) | f (0) = g(1) and f (1) = g(0)
equivalence relation is a binary relation that is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
a)
equivalence relation
reflexive: f (1) = f(1)
symmetric: if f (1) = g(1) then g(1) = f(1)
transitive: if f (1) = g(1) and g(1) = h (1) then f(1) = h(1)
b)
not equivalence relation
reflexive: f (0) = f(0) or f (1) = f(1)
symmetric: if f(0) = g(0) or f (1) = g(1) then g(0) = f(0) or g(1) = f(1)
not transitive: if f(0) = g(0) and g(1) = h(1) then not f(0) = h(0)
c)
not equivalence relation
Not reflexive: f(x)−f(x) = 0
Not symmetric: if f(x)−g(x) = 1, then g(x)−f(x) = −1
Not transitive: if f(x) − g(x) = 1 and g(x) − h(x) = 1, then f(x) − h(x) = 2
d)
equivalence relation
reflexive: f (x) − f(x) = 0 = const
symmetric: if f (x) − g(x) = C then g(x) − f(x) = -C = const
transitive: if f f (x) − g(x) = C1 and g(x) − h(x) = C2 then f(x) − h(x) = C1+C2 = const
e)
not equivalence relation
not reflexive: f(0) = f(1) isn’t always true
not symmetric: if f (0) = g(1) and f (1) = g(0) then not g(0) = f(1) and g(1) = f(0)
not transitive: for example, let f(x) = h(x) = x and g(x) = 1−x. Then f ≡ g and g ≡ h, but not f ≡ h
Comments
Leave a comment