(a) Suppose f and g are functions whose domains are subsets of z+, the set of positive integers. Give the definition of 'f is "\\Omicron"(g)'
(b) Use the definition of 'f is "\\Omicron"(g)' to show that:
(I) 2n+27 is "\\Omicron"(3n)
(ii) 5n is not "\\Omicron"(4n)
Let "f" and "g" are functions whose domains are subsets of "\\Z_+", the set of positive integers. We say that "f" is "O(g)" if there exist a positive real number "c" and a positive integer "n_0" such that "f(n)\\le cg(n)" for all "n\\ge n_0."
(b) Let us use the definition of 'f is "\\Omicron"(g)' to show that the following statements.
(I) Since "2^n+27<3^n+27\\cdot 3^n=28\\cdot 3^n" for each positive integer "n," we put "c=28" and conclude that "2^n+27" is "O(3^n)."
(ii) Let us show that "5^n" is not "O(4^n)." Let us prove using the method by contradiction. Suppose that there exist a positive real number "c" and a positive integer "n_0" such that "5^n\\le c\\cdot 4^n" for all "n\\ge n_0."
It follows that "(\\frac{5}{4})^n\\le c" for all "n\\ge n_0." Since "\\lim\\limits_{n\\to+\\infty}(\\frac{5}{4})^n=+\\infty," we conclude that there exist "m\\in\\Z_+" such that "(\\frac{5}{4})^n>c" for all "n\\ge m." This contradiction proves the statement.
Comments
Leave a comment