Answer to Question #276210 in Management for Shelley

Question

What lessons that you have learnt from the case study “Converging or Diverging? A Comparative Analysis of Trends in Contingent Employment Practice in Europe over a Decade”? Why?

500 words

Answer 1

Concerning the case of a converging conversation, I have been in a position to make some comparative analysis on the trends in contingent employment practicing Europe over the decade. In this case, I have been in a position to learn about the whereabouts concerning the vulnerability of contingent employment practice to both convergent and divergent pressures and how it serves as a useful analytical perspective tool. In this case, the information is drawn from organizations operating in Germany, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the UK in 1991 (2918 organizations), 1995 (2048 organizations), and 2000 (1555 organizations). The results suggest that convergence is limited by the institutional insertion of organizations.

Therefore, my learnings have been based on, the case of homogeneousness and heterogeneity in management exercises across national boundaries stokes the convergence and divergence discussion. The pressures between the two forces are intensified in comparative human resource management (HRM) because of the relationship between HRM and the institutional context with research in Europe demonstrating the importance of national institutional structures for HRM practice. Additional developments in this field need to address some of the current pragmatic confines and conceptual uncertainty. First, much of the work to date focuses on static similarities and differences, providing only a partial analysis of the situation. An analysis of trends over time is needed to provide more inclusive empirical insights into the dynamic processes of conjunction or disagreement.

Moreover, the point of concern that I have learned is on the meaning of the terms ‘convergence’ and ‘divergence’ and the way it has been mystified, somewhat because of the complications of piloting proportional research, and the organizational dilemmas this creates. There is a need for greater elaboration of the terms. As an influence to this, the research findings have suggested the case of using the terms ‘directional convergence’ for similarity in trends and ‘final convergence’ for increasing resemblance of practice. In the end, case, because preliminary practices are unrelated, trends may or may not be in the same course but designate snowballing correspondence in connotation. This hypothetical development is noteworthy in analytical terms because it enhances the provision of the boundaries for the elucidation of observed practices, which is it defines with bigger lucidity the substance of observed similarities and differences in carrying out. Thus, this may overcome some of the confusing and deceptive disagreeing empirical evidence. In terms of hypothetical prediction and elucidation of observed practices, this greater elaboration of the term ‘convergence’ reassures greater precision in the empathy of organizational sources of influence and their impact.

Furthermore, I have learned that the Contingent employment exercises depict varying approaches to Influencing managerial flexibility: namely, the capability to acclimate with no unwarranted pain or charge to the necessities of the market, a case that is seen as critical to the modest success of businesses. As the resultant effect, there might be an expectation on the novelties to be duplicated by others, or for such novelties to be simulated within similar organizational contexts. Europe provides a captivating context for examining the adoption of managerial exercise because of the dichotomy of its institutional background. The efforts in Europe to generate a continent-wide set of establishments above the nationwide ones are exclusive and, perhaps, are leading to varying models of HRM. The five European countries included; Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the UK the countries considered to be the members of the European Union and as such are theme to the convergent policy pressures from the European market and the European Commission.