Answer to Question #187692 in Law for Alex

Question

Read this prompt: Miranda v. Arizona 1966 was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that statements made in response to interrogation by a suspect in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning.

What is one result of the court's decision?

A. Potential witnesses to a crime do not have to speak during the trial.

B. Those that investigate crimes were given more power and authority.

C. Suspects are not required to speak to police without an attorney present.

D. Every citizen, whether innocent or guilt, now has access to a proper criminal trial.

Answer 1

C. Suspects are not required to speak to police without an attorney present.