British Law Answers

Why is racial discrimination illegal on employment websites but not on social websites such as Facebook or Tinder?

how can the justice functionaries incoporate the use of ubuntu principles in their daily work

A is unpaid seller of bike for Rs, 10000, B, the buyer, defaulted in payment. A, without giving notice to B, re-sold the bike to C for Rs, 12000.
Give short but reasoned answers to the following questions.
i. Can A legally re-sell the bike to C without giving any notice to B?

Ghazala, the wife of Naseer is ready to sue her husband for maintenance allowance, naseer agreed to pay her a monthly allowance and Ghazala forebears to sue him, also mention if naseer says that the said amount will be paid by naseer sister (zarganoon) and her wife agreed, and what option will be available to Ghazala if the Zarganoon’s cheque way dishonoured

(c) Ghazala, the wife of Naseer is ready to sue her husband for maintenance allowance, naseer agreed to pay her a monthly allowance and Ghazala forebears to sue him, also mention if naseer says that the said amount will be paid by naseer sister (zarganoon) and her wife agreed, and what option will be available to Ghazala if the Zarganoon’s cheque way dishonoured

Ghazala, the wife of Naseer is ready to sue her husband for maintenance allowance, naseer agreed to pay her a monthly allowance and Ghazala forebears to sue him, also mention if naseer says that the said amount will be paid by naseer sister (zarganoon) and her wife agreed, and what option will be available to Ghazala if the Zarganoon’s cheque way dishonoured (1.5)

(a) A is unpaid seller of bike for Rs, 10000, B, the buyer, defaulted in payment. A, without giving notice to B, re-sold the bike to C for Rs, 12000.
Give short but reasoned answers to the following questions.
i. Can A legally re-sell the bike to C without giving any notice to B? (0.5)
ii. Who, A or B is entitled to the surplus of Rs, 2000. In the sale proceeds of re-sale to C?

Q.5: (a) X sells by auction to Y a horse which X knows to be unsound. The horse appears to be sound but X knows about the unsoundness of the horse. Is this contract a valid in each of the following alternative cases.
X says nothing about the unsoundness of the horse to Y (0.5)
If y says to X ‘if you do not deny it, I shall assume that the horse is sound’ X says nothing (0.5)
(b) X buys a painting believing it to be worth Rs 100000 while in fact it is worth only Rs 10000. Is it valid contract? (0.5)
(c) Ghazala, the wife of Naseer is ready to sue her husband for maintenance allowance, naseer agreed to pay her a monthly allowance and Ghazala forebears to sue him, also mention if naseer says that the said amount will be paid by naseer sister (zarganoon) and her wife agreed, and what option will be available to Ghazala if the Zarganoon’s cheque way dishonoured