Answer to Question #230245 in History for Lala

Question

Use your own example or case study to discuss the limitations of world history. Consider the historical narratives chosen, sources used or ignored, and regions and perspectives emphasised or overlooked. (20 marks)

Answer 1

World history is a vital sensation that exists in the social order and it communicates the story of diverse fragments of the world and major events in history. Nevertheless, the world history has many limitations which make it inappropriate to be trusted upon by those looking for vital evidence from the past.

First, unsuitable use of equivalences limits the use of history to modern-day events in the society thus leading to misunderstanding. Improper analogies can also lead to misperception when applied in the field of intelligence. There is a danger of misinterpretation if an explainer utilizes perceived analogies to suit their arguments.

 In addition, the journals of the world history are grounded on the conclusions of one person who might have been a spectator in the events of the past thus it is liable to to human errors such as bias and lack of consideration to significant facts. There are some circumstances of misinterpretation of the world history which conveys about confusion when lecturing important happenings in history.

The narrative used in the world history is doubtful since it special treats the western culture more than other regions and it shows the region as being superhuman even when there are some important influences made by other regions. The concept of conflict is overstressed in the world history whereas other significant concepts such as religion and trade are only mentioned without details.