South African Legal Practice Council v Shirinda [2021] ZAGPPHC 144 (3 February
2021)
Now summarise the case in the prescribed manner
statting the Summary of the facts, Legal Questions, The court's reason for its decision and the judgment.
Legal Practice Act 28 of 2014 – legal practitioners to be admitted and enrolled either as advocate or attorney – s 115 preserves theright of any person who qualified for admission as an advocate, attorney, conveyancer or notary prior to the commencement of the Act to be so admitted thereafter – preservation of right extends ad infinitum – s 32 empowers Legal Practice Council to convert enrolment of a legalpractitioner without recourse to the high court – s 32 does not detract from jurisdiction of the high courto order the Legal Practice Council toenrol a legal practitioner as an advocate where the practitioner qualifies for enrolment as such in terms of the Legal Practice Act.
Comments
I need an explanation on how to summarize the case.
Leave a comment