(i) The players are provider and the firm.
The firm has a dominant strategy, and is a first mover.
(ii) "profit = k(100-K) - Kr =100k-k^2-kr,"
You can maximise profit by differentiating profit with respect to K
"100-2k-r=0,"
"k=50-0.5r" , so this gives how much capital they will rent.
Now the capital owner has a profit function of
"rk =r(50-0.5r)=50r-0.5r^2"
Differentiate with respect to r = 0
"50-r=0,"
r = 50.
(iii) There are no (K, r) which will generate a higher total pay-off, than the total pay-off at the SPE.
(iv) There is no Nash equilibrium for which the outcome differs from any subgame perfect equilibrium outcome.
Comments
Leave a comment