Rubber Co manufactures tennis balls. On 1 January 2010, Rubber Co purchased a
new machine for $1.1m (inclusive of GST) which it used to produce the tin cans in
which its tennis balls were placed for sale to retailers. At the time of acquiring the
machine , Rubber Co estimated that the machine would have an effective life of 10
years before it needed to be replaced. Subsequently, on 1 January 2014, as a result
of new technology, a better quality machine became available and Rubber Co
decided to sell the original machine for $330,000 (inclusive of GST) and purchase a
new machine for $2.2m (inclusive of GST).
Requirement:
What are the tax consequences of these arrangements under Div 40ITAA97?
1
Expert's answer
2016-05-24T10:40:03-0400
On 1 January 2010, Rubber Co purchased a new machine for $1.1m (inclusive of GST), its effective life is 10 years. On 1 January 2014, Rubber Co decided to sell the original machine for $330,000 (inclusive of GST) and purchase a new machine for $2.2m (inclusive of GST). According to the tax consequences of these arrangements under Div 40ITAA97, taxes will be paid from the both purchases and one sell.
"assignmentexpert.com" is professional group of people in Math subjects! They did assignments in very high level of mathematical modelling in the best quality. Thanks a lot
Comments