My orders
How it works
Examples
Reviews
Blog
Homework Answers
Submit
Sign in
How it works
Examples
Reviews
Homework answers
Blog
Contact us
Submit
Fill in the order form to get the price
Subject
Select Subject
Programming & Computer Science
Math
Engineering
Economics
Physics
Other
Category
Statistics and Probability
Calculus
Differential Equations
Quantitative Methods
Discrete Mathematics
Financial Math
Real Analysis
Abstract Algebra
Linear Algebra
Complex Analysis
Functional Analysis
Differential Geometry | Topology
Combinatorics | Number Theory
Analytic Geometry
Operations Research
Other
Deadline
Timezone:
Title
*
Task
*
QUESTION 5 In this question you have to construct formal proofs using the natural deduction rules. The Fitch system makes use of these rules. Remember that De Morgan’s laws and other tautologies are not permissible natural deduction rules. You are also not allowed to use Taut Con, Ana Con or FO Con. It is important to number your statements, to indicate subproofs and at each step to give the rule that you are using Question 5.1 Using the natural deduction rules, prove that the following two premises are contradictory: 1 R → (P v Q) 2 R /\ ¬P /\ ¬Q Question 5.2 Using the natural deduction rules, give a formal proof of | 1. ¬S | 2. P → Q | 3. Q → (R v S) | 4. P v R |--- | R Question 5.3 Prove ∃x[P(x) → ∀yP(y)] from no premises
I need basic explanations
Special Requirements
Upload files (if required)
Drop files here to upload
Add files...
Account info
Already have an account?
Create an account
Name
*
E-mail
*
Password
*
The password must be at least 6 characters.
I agree with
terms & conditions
Create account & Place an order
Please fix the following input errors:
dummy
