Answer to Question #284254 in Psychology for likkle

Question

Explain fully why the denial of the Cogito ergo Sum is not logically self-contradictory?

Answer 1

The denial of the Cogito ergo Sum not logically self-contradictory since the argument has fallacies that undermine its validity. Descartes’ statement relies on the validity of grammar for its metaphysical argument. The statement assumes that “I exist” make the thinking before making the conclusion that “I” exists. This argument is not logically self-contradictory because it explains the phenomena of sense through rational philosophy. As depicted by Descartes, I distinguish my existence as that of a thinking being from that of other things external of me in which my body is also reckoned. This is an analytical proposition in which all things that are distinguishable or different from me.

On the other hand, the preposition of identity I is a manifest representation of self-consciousness. In this case, this argument cannot be analyzed through a mare proposition, but through a synthetically judgment (Sion, 2013). When Descartes claims that, the denial of the Cogito ergo Sum’s self-contradictory, he means that its concept give rise to a paradox. He uses two prepositions, which are “I thinks” to mean that I am conscious and “I am” to mean I exist. In this case, “I am not conscious” could not be said or thought.