Answer to Question #232782 in Psychology for Steve

Question

Briefly contrast structuralism versus functionalism, and discuss why Sigmund Freud’s theories were considered to be so controversial.

Out of the five psychological perspectives, (evolutionary (biological), Behavioral (Learning), Cognitive, Sociocultural, and Psychodynamic), if you had a noisy, rude, surly neighbor and wanted to explain why this guy was such a miserable person, which perspective would you use and why?

Write a two-page APA style paper not including title page, describing the information.

Answer 1

Structuralism theories study the human mind and the basic structures, which can be acknowledged via introspection. Functionalism concentrates on more objective forms of study and maintains that it's essential to study facets of the human mind and behaviour regarding functions. Structuralism proposes that the objective of psychology is to study and analyse the basic structures of the mind and cognisance, while functionalism recommends that understanding the purpose of the mind and cognisance is the objective of psychology.

While Freud understood that his findings of the Oedipal complex and correlated philosophies, for instance, castration disquiet and penis resentment were his utmost deeds, these concepts are possibly his most disapproved. Female psychoanalysts, for instance, Karen Horney and other feminist theorists have labelled his concepts as misleading. It is contended that the findings attained by the free-associative process contest the philosophical assumptions on which all "regular science" is created. By demonstrating that human cognisance consists of inconsistently of two dimensionalities of significance (desire and semiosis), psychoanalytic technique challenges the adages of a centred or integrated coherent subject, which can seek to articulate univocal "realities" regarding the self and its realm. Freud Is an out-of-date fossil, particularly for individuals working in the field and involved in the procedure itself, the notion of analysing the basic id, ego, and superego and dream breakdown are profoundly unsophisticated skills and concepts that will do little in the approach of addressing the concerns that contemporary mental health care survives to address and alleviate.

The Four Perspectives of Psychological Science; If you had a noisy impolite, brusque neighbour and you asked a group of psychologists to explain why this gentleman was such a depressed person you would possibly receive different explanations. It is due to his biological temperament, his aggressive brashness toward the world, the approach he has learned to utilise his horrible anger to get his way, and an unfortunate family condition or the tradition of his ethos. Modern psychological scientists naturally approach their examinations (studies) from one of four different though intersecting the theories such as biological learning cognitive and socio-cultural facets. Each viewpoint mirrors different questions and factors regarding human behaviour, which offer different assumptions regarding how the mind functions and most significant supplies different ways of elucidating why individuals do what they do. There are numerous movements, for example, feminist psychology has developed that do not fit well into one of these standpoints.